Skip to main navigation

Catalogue Blog

Keep It Small?

Look, I’m nervous about this column, because I don’t want to discourage giving. But donations could accomplish far more if people thought through their philanthropy, did more research, and made fewer, bigger contributions instead of many small ones that are expensive to handle.

On this Monday, I am actually opening with someone else’s conclusion. Nicholas D. Kristof published this Opinion piece in the New York Times on Saturday — and I was ready and willing to argue with him based on the two sentences: “This holiday season, Americans will dig into their pockets for good causes. But these gifts will sometimes benefit charlatans or extremists, or simply be wasted.” First, why would you ever discourage generosity, particularly in these economic times? Second, even if blanket discouragement was not your goal, why generalize?

However, I did read on to the above-quoted conclusion — and I ultimately appreciate the sharp language at the beginning of his article. In fact, it forces the reader to do exactly what the donor should do: look deep, read carefully, and be sure that you know what you are seeing. Throughout the piece, Kristof highlights (or more accurately, calls out) several non-profit organizations that prey upon the propensity of religious donors to give liberally to organizations that they assume share their values. In truth, several well-known charities with seemingly-strong religious ties are careless with their money or reckless in their dealings — or both. Continue reading

In The News …

Happy Wednesday, Greater Washington! Are you avoiding the rain? Are you stuck indoors? Just spend some extra time on the Catalogue blog. We have our Mid-Week News today, plus more 7 Questions coming your way tomorrow! We’ve also created a 7 Questions archive. So if you’re like me and enjoy poking through blog histories, you now easily can peruse past interviews.

[ UPDATE: Okay. So I woke up this morning and, lo and behold, gorgeous fall weather. So enjoy the sunshine and then catch up on some non-profit news! ]

Celebrities Hire Philanthropy Consultants to Guide Their Giving — We actually had a blog post about this yesterday, so do check out both that (tell us what you think!) and the LA Times article from this past Sunday. The article examines the “attempt by celebrities to display a deep commitment to issues beyond their next movie or album” and the rising demand for multi-skilled philanthropic advisers who can facilitate just that. Continue reading

Put Me In, Coach! (Again)

A few weeks back, I wrote a post on this NY Times interview with the global head of philanthropic services at JP Morgan Private Bank. Lisa Philp acts as a “philanthropy coach” primarily to wealthy individuals and family foundations, who all are looking “to achieve as much as possible through wise giving.”

At the time, I focused on the language with which Philp describes her work, which drew heavily upon both the sports and finance worlds. I really didn’t think much about the backgrounds and details of her client list — both because she did not name names and because, in this context, the interests and subsequent investments seemed more interesting than the clients themselves.

But what about when the client is more “interesting” (or attention-getting) than the cause? Continue reading

All About Innovating

Many of our grantees’ plans evolve and take on different shapes, and rightly so. In fact, a spectacular “failure” might be more informative and useful than a more modest “success” in terms of helping both the organization and the larger field move forward in addressing the challenges of the new century and the future.

A question I find myself asking is: How does an organization go from being one tackling an innovative project to one with an organizational culture dedicated to innovation?

Good question. Last week, the Chronicle posted a four-installment interview with Ben Cameron, program director for the arts at Doris Duke Charitable Foundation. From 2007 to 2013, DDCF is funding an “an experimental pilot initiative designed to enable a group of artistically outstanding organizations to strengthen their business in a shifting environment.” In other words, these grants don’t support particular programs, but catalyze organizational growth. They don’t sponsor a single change, but rather position companies to change and develop constantly. Ever wanted to re-think (somewhat or very radically) how you do business? These are grants specifically for that.

Continue reading

In The News …

Good morning, Washington! I hope that November is treating you well. Just wanted to share a couple interesting articles with you, plus a couple great news items from our non-profits!

Donations by the Wealthy Dropped — Yesterday, the Chronicle of Philanthropy reported that “gifts to charities from wealthy Americans plummeted by an average of nearly 35 percent from 2007 to 2009.” That said, the decline in the economy is a much more likely cause than a decline in interest or investment, as the study “found an uptick in volunteering among wealthy Americans. More than 3/4 of the wealthy donors volunteered at least some time last year the average number of volunteer hours rose from 241 to 307.” The article also has some cool insight into why donors give when and how they do. Check it out right here.

Continue reading

Always An Election Day

… For astute leaders looking to grow, treat every day like election day — a new opportunity to learn, to build trust, to forge commitment, and to get out the vote in support of your organization’s better tomorrows. It’s not easy, but over time it’s a leadership journey many will sign on to.

Yesterday, I linked to this On Leadership page from the Post website. Just to re-cap, the Post asked its panel what the first thing that President Obama, or any “military or non-profit leader,” should do when confronted with an “unambiguously negative evaluation” of their performance or their organization. And I am seriously digging this brief, yet incisive answer from Susan Peters, VP of executive development and chief learning officer of GE.

Is an election equivalent to an evaluation? I’m not so sure. And can we say definitively that the radical re-shuffling of Congress was an “evaluation” of the President and not, say, Congress? I’m not sure about that one either. But I think that Peters’ point still stands. A good “leadership journey” does not (and should not) entail a biannual self-assessment, but a daily one. Maybe even an hourly one. A constant one.

Continue reading